Minnesota V. Riff Essay - 1110 Words

Minnesota v. Riff Interpersonal Communications/CJA-304 September 24, 2011 University of Phoenix Abstract Identify and discuss the various types of written or oral communication presented in the case and the guidelines for each type of communication. Consider the prosecution, defense, witnesses, and the judge. Write an arrest-and-incident police report using the specified guidelines and parameters for report writing as outlined in the assigned readings. Assume the role of the investigating officer. The report must be factual, accurate, objective, and complete. Ensure the police report is as long as necessary, concise, clear, and mechanically correct. Types of Written and Oral Communication Prosecution The various types†¦show more content†¦The witnesses stated that the sacks that Mr. Riff was charged with carrying that contained the money were issued to him at the poker game. Mr. Riff testified he grabbed the hammer to use as a security measure for him in order to protect his winnings. The Defense disputes Mr. Riff tossed the hammer away prior to arriving home and in no way meant to steal from the market. The Defense in this case exercised oral communication by exploiting the redundancy in this case. This was to establish that the eyewitness testimonies for the prosecution were incorrect and imperfection was found during the police investigation. Witnesses The witnesses in the Minnesota v. Riff case would have used verbal communication when communicating with the police and the Defense Attorney. During the trial they would have used oral communication. The witnesses would also have used visual communication in describing to the Judge, the Prosecutor, the Defense Attorney, and the Jury what they saw. Also, the witnesses would have used written communication during their personal statements to the police and the Attorneys. Police Arrest/Incident Report Incident Type: Burglary Incident Date: Saturday, September 24, 2011 Time: Approximately 12:30 am Address: Marquette’s Market- Corner of Main and First Street Officer Name: Officer Terry Shields, Minnesota Police Department Offender/Suspect: Ronald Riff Victim: Speedy Marquette (Store Owner) Witnesses: Marty Martini,Show MoreRelatedCommunication and Criminal Justice6158 Words   |  25 Pages|Resource: Minnesota v. Riff court case documents, or a similar court case’s documents that are|in class – | | | |as complex as Minnesota v. Riff and are approved by your instructor. | | | | | |Due by 3-4-13 | | | |Search the Internet for the Minnesota v. Riff courtRead MoreLangston Hughes Research Paper25309 Words   |  102 Pagesdeferred. Hughes described the Montage as poems marked by conflicting changes, sudden nuances, sharp and impudent interjections, broken rhythms, and passages sometimes in the manner of the jam session, sometimes the popular song, punctuated by the riffs, runs, breaks, and disc-tortions of the music of a community in transition. Montage of a Dream Deferred, illustrated by Jacob Lawrence, was not published by Henry Holt until 1951. Many of the poems were later set to music by composer Howard SwansonRead MoreCase Studies67624 Words   |  271 Pages(Living Media India Ltd), 22 April. Connect Magazine, 1998, Worldwide Feedback Form: www.connectmagazine.com/June 1998/Junepgshtml/June98Wwind.html. DeGarmo, K., 1998, ‘Mulan Happy Meal goes worldwide’, The Fort Worth Star Telegram, 16 June. Deshpande, V., ‘McDonald’s goes more Indian’: www.financialexpress.com/fe/daily/20000910/faf10031.html. The Ecologist, 1995, ‘Kentucky Fried Chicken protests in India’ , October. The Economist, 1997, ‘Spice with everything’, 22 November. Happy Birthday, ‘Maharaja

Choc Delux Liability Under the Tort of Negligence Free Essay Example, 1000 words

According to English law for tort of negligence, claimant (Kim) needs to prove number decision points to help the court to find evidences of negligence showed by Choc Delux. Decision Point 1: In order to prove evidence of negligence, Claimant (Kim) will need to show that defendant (Choc Delux) owed the duty of care towards claimant (Harlow, 2005). In similar context, the case of ‘Donoghue versus Stevenson’ can be used as reference point. In that case, House of Lords gave verdict that in case of generally duty being assumed by Claimant, evidence of negligence cannot be proved. However, in this case, Claimant (Kim) is customer defendant (Choc Delux) and defendant gifted the cake to Claimant. Therefore, Choc Delux owed the duty of care towards Kim. Decision Point 2: After showing that Choc Delux owed her duty of care, Claimant (Kim) needs to prove that defendant (Choc Delux) is at fault or the defendant (Choc Delux) has breached its duty of care. In such context, first, the courts determine the standard of care that Choc Delux owed to Kim. We will write a custom essay sample on Choc Delux: Liability Under the Tort of Negligence or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now Although, there is no written contract between Claimants (Kim) is customer defendant (Choc Delux) but breach of duty can be proved the court by using the clause of business ethics and quality standards (Marcy, Gentry and McKinnon, 2008). As a result, it is reasonable to think that the court will find evidence for breach of duty of care by defendant (Choc Delux). Decision Point 3: At this phase, Claimant (Kim) needs show that breach of duty by defendant (Choc Delux) caused the damage (physical injury and monetary expense of  £10,000). The court will use ‘but-for’ test to determine the validity of claim by the Claimant (Kim) (Harlow, 2005). Court will ask the question, â€Å"but for the Choc Delux’s (defendant)’ tort, would Kim (Claimant) have suffered the loss. In such case, Kim can use the doctor’s diagnosis, medical reports to show that damage was caused by the defendant (Choc Delux). In extreme case, chemical tests can be conducted to show that ‘false finger nail’ was part of the wedding cake when it was delivered by defendant (Choc Delux). Decision Point 4: finally, damage suffered by Claimant (Kim) must be part of the damage that can be recovered under English law for tort of negligence. Kim’s case is not loss of chance to avoid damage (physical injury and monetary expense of  £10,000). Therefore, it will not be difficult for Kim to pass the 4th decision point (Lewis, Morris and Oliphant, 2006). All the four decision points are in favour of Claimant (Kim) and these criteria can be fulfilled by Kim in the court.

Running Head North Sea Oil and Gas Free Essays

Every business or industry is prone to various risks which include floods, earthquake, terrorists which the industry should put mechanisms in place to avoid such. Effective contingency planning has been of importance to most industries that embrace the idea. North Sea oil and Gas has for a long time been prone to the problem of changing weather conditions which is especially experienced in the sea. We will write a custom essay sample on Running Head: North Sea Oil and Gas or any similar topic only for you Order Now The companies that exploit the North Sea oil and gas have put a lot of emphasis on risk management and most of the companies have set up risk management departments (Leslie and Michaels, 1997). Numerous deaths had occurred during the exploitation of North Sea oil and gas in the 1970s and 1980s and this called for effective contingency planning to reduce the losses incurred by loosing workforce and by spillage of oil and gas due to buckles. The companies that exploit the gas and oil have invested in the contingency planning as a way of way of managing the risks (Leslie and Michaels, 1997). North Sea oil and gas has been a source of wealth to the countries that exploit the resource. North Sea oil has been used to refer to the oil and natural gas exists beneath the North Sea. The countries that exploit the North Sea oil and gas include Netherlands, Norway, Germany, United Kingdom and Denmark. Most countries and especially companies that have been given license to exploit the resource have taken proactive measures of risk. Mining beneath the sea has led to many deaths of the people involved and this has called for heavy investment in risk management projects undertaken by the companies. The pipes that transfer the oil and natural gas from underground reservoirs to processing plants which are mainly located some distance from the sea must be strong to withstand the waves in the sea. Depending on weather changes, waves differ in their height and this call for contingency planning otherwise heavy losses are incurred by the particular company (Leslie and Michaels, 1997). In the 1970s, the North Sea oil a gas companies took proactive measures to avoid heavy losses that resulted when waves exceeded the height of 3 meters. The operators laid many pipes which assumed the shape of S to maintain smoothness between the large barge and the ocean floor. The operators used bow anchors to further buckles by raising and resetting the pipes at the barges. The operators had to be keen because improper lowering of pipes would result into a pipe buckle which presented a serious threat in laying the pipes. The excessive height of waves which exceeded the anticipated height resulted in further risk of pipe buckles due to uncontrolled lowering of pipes. The companies therefore had to purchase a large number of steel pipes to avoid delays incase of any pipe buckle and this methods was not cost effective as the company would have desired. Any proactive measure that is taken to manage risk should be cost effective, utility effective and must therefore be maximizing benefits for the company while minimizing cost (Leslie and Michaels, 1997). An effective contingency planning in managing risks in project requires good planning and coordination of all the stakeholders in the project to ensure maximum desirable result. Risk management involves taking measures in dealing with uncertainty. The North Sea and oil contingency planning that was adopted in 19790s involves dealing with uncertainty because in favorable weather conditions, there is less cost involved in dealing with risks since pipe buckles will be few and hence very few new pipes will be required to be laid. However, since it’s hard to predict the height of the waves in the sea which can cause heavy losses if unchecked, the companies that explore the oil and gas in the areas must take precautionary measures (Leslie and Michaels, 1997). Exploration of North Sea oil any natural gas involves making wealth for the companies that are undertaking the projects. The importance of contingency planning in the exploration project is very essential in risk management because it’s used to assess the possibility of bad weather condition which is a threat to the project. The assessment is consequently used to reduce the possibility of underperformance that may be realized when no measures are undertaken to reduce or avoid the pipe buckles. The cost of replacing buckled pipes reduces the profit margin that is realized in the project and therefore effective contingency planning help to manage the risk. Effective contingency planning helps to capture the benefits of fair weather. Uncertainty about weather conditions is a threat that faces the North Sea offshore pipe laying. If effective contingency planning is observed, long periods of bad weather can be sustained because the project major should be able to recognize and deal with the bad condition threat which is inevitable. The project managers should ensure there is plenty supply of pipes during bad weather condition to avoid delays in replacing the buckle pipes. The project managers should observe good contingency planning by ensuring that the oil and gas pipeline are complete before the bad weather sets in and this will assist in reducing the costs associated with contingency planning. Laying pipelines in time helps in avoiding major delays in the project which may result in heavy monetary losses. Contingency planning for reducing possible threats that are associated with North Sea and oil exploration could be a possible way of increasing income to the companies that are undertaking the project. American project management institute (PMI) argue that there is a possible opportunity associated with the risks that threaten the project in winter, bad weather conditions has been known to lead to gas shortage in most cities which due to law of demand, the prices increase. This could be an opportunity for those companies that are concerned with the project. Effective contingency planning in managing risk North Sea oil and gas has created an opportunity to the companies undertaking the project. This is attributed to the precautions taken by the companies in anticipation of bad weather threat. The project involves paying for delivery before the contract begins. Most companies that want to protect themselves from the deficient supply of the resources therefore buy the resources before the contract begins. The high demand has contributed to higher revenue derived from the project and this consequently results to higher profitability (Leslie and Michaels, 1997). Contingency planning which is mainly associated with managing risks should not only focus on the threats that hamper the success of the project but should also view threats as an opportunity to achieve the objectives of the project. Achievement of objectives means the project has succeeded. Therefore effective contingency planning in addressing risks should recognize the close relationship of threats and opportunities. The actions taken by the project manager in reducing the risks should seek to create an opportunity for excellence (Leslie and Michaels, 1997). Effective contingency planning should not focus on managing threats. Instead the project should seek to identify the different sources of risks and consequently how to manage the risks. Focus on risks draw emphasis on the anticipated failure. Therefore, assessing the various sources of uncertainty and how those uncertainties can be a threat to the project and consequently how to manage the uncertainties involves application of effective contingency planning. North Sea oil and gas exploration is associated with many uncertainties which present various threats to the project. Focus on the opportunities created by the uncertainties management can lead to profitability and success of the project. The project manager should identify the origins of uncertainties instead of managing risk first and this will assist in addressing the root of the problem. Most projects have failed to meet the set objectives due to their failure to address the root of the problems. Superficial problem solving has led undesirable results. Therefore identification of the source of uncertainties should be considered as the beginning of the risk management process in effective contingency planning (Leslie and Michaels, 1997). Uncertainty is present in every project and in all stages of the project life cycle (PLC). The uncertainty is contributed by various reasons which are inevitable. All projects success is based on various assumptions which are the main sources of uncertainties. Differences in the performance of project concerning cost, quality and duration that is required to complete the project bring a lot of uncertainties. In laying pipes in the ocean in a way that will avoid pipe buckles involved a lot of uncertainties. This is attributed to the changing weather conditions. Its hard to forecast the height of the waves in the ocean in a particular season and this present source of uncertainties since its hard to know with certainty the cost of dealing with the threat since its hard to tell the amount of pipes to be knocked down and therefore requiring replacement (Leslie and Michaels, 1997). Proactive risk management in the North Sea oil and gas project should be entrenched in both base plans and contingency plans. It’s argued that if a project focuses very much on being cost effective it’s bound to fail on risk management in some occasions. However, crisis management should only be used as principal management in some occasions. However, crisis management should only be used as principal management mode if the risk management fails completely (Leslie and Michaels, 1997). References Leslie, Keith, J. and Michaels, Max, P. â€Å"The Real Power of Real Options†. The McKinsey Quarterly 3 (1997):134-225. How to cite Running Head: North Sea Oil and Gas, Essay examples

Implementing Process Management

Question: Prepare a blog on implementing process management in 500 Words. Answer: This blog talks about running the flourishing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) projects through planning, implementing and operating by means of Risk management system. It centers on the classification of chief issues in running ERP projects and mounting a risk management structure; planned by investigating the risk and efficiency in the ERP executing projects and recognizing the risk aspects to create some ideas in the extenuating dimensions. In particular, this method made easy the recognition of main issues in the running of ERP projects and the growth of a model for administrating the rising risk issues. These days, business has distorted to the global market. It gives various challenges to an organization by accepting ERP system to achieve competitive advantages presentation, together with attaining customer anticipation and market growth. The rationale is ERP can help out them, particularly big projects in the explanation of the disintegration concerns by incorporating all or ganizations workflow. Furthermore, there are chief issues in the commencement projects that the effects these systems process. There are many issues in applying ERP projects which include matters associated with IT, managerial change, and project management. For example, there are risks such as holdups in conducting over sign-off and consequences of other projects on ERP have important impacts on project management. Inadequate business wealth and holdups in making alteration to a bequest system have high impact on organizational change. Likewise, negligence of overall IT architecture results noteworthy impact on IT associated processes. Also, a flourishing ERP execution engages numerous factors like: Apparent the goal of business planned. Top management has tough obligations. Exceptional project management Change Management organizational. An outstanding implementation group Give high-quality learning and training. Focus on measuring performance. The frameworks of risk management are recognizing, classifying, and evaluating, administrating, and finishing risk. Managing risk across diverse stages of project and equivalent stress to efficient project management, organizational change and IT acceptance are some of the key factors in accomplishment of ERP implementation (Dey, Clegg Bennett, 2010). It is the method to execute the business in the market. In addition, an organization can use the roll-out plan, which can sustain business processes. A flourishing project management requires several checklists in some tasks; which are (Becker, Kugeler, Rosemann, 2011): Influence; Information and training; Training and consultancy; Sensibility; Motivation; Documentation, which must be crystal clear in the business procedures and documenting some, recognized report accomplishments. Organizations regularly put Process Management into practice for an array of motives. Nonetheless, the major motivation is to be further competitive in the powerful rivalry of todays financial system. A bulk of company leaders are forced to be aggressive through enhanced contributions and the accomplishment of improved efficiency, while at the same time falling overall costs and proceeding business processes. ERP systems offer considerable profits but their implementations engage considerable capital pay outs and lofty breakdown risks (Zeng, 2010). References Becker, J., Kugeler, M., Rosemann, M., 2011,Process Management : A Guide for the Design of Business Processes, 2ndedition, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Dey, P., Clegg, B., Bennett, D., 2010. Managing enterprise resource planning projects.Business Process Management Journal,16, 2 (2010), pp. 282-296. Zeng, Y., 2010. Risk management for enterprise resource planning system implementation in project-based firms.